Обсуждение:Юхары баш
Проект «Азербайджан» (уровень III, важность для проекта высокая)
Эта статья тематически связана с вики-проектом «Азербайджан», цель которого — создание и улучшение статей по темам, связанным с Азербайджаном. Вы можете её отредактировать, а также присоединиться к проекту, принять участие в его обсуждении и поработать над требуемыми статьями. |
Статья «Юхары баш» создана или доработана в рамках Марафона искусств (все статьи конкурса). Номинация: Изобразительное искусство и архитектура (все конкурсные статьи по теме). Участник: Interfase. |  |
Суждение ICOMOS
правитьИнтересно, что в 2019 г. ICOMOS не нашёл в Шеки ничего, опрадывающего его включение в список Всемирного наследия. Информация, приведённая ниже, достойна включения в статью. — Ghirla -трёп- 21:55, 11 августа 2019 (UTC)
- Значимость
ICOMOS further considers that Sheki’s architectural and urban testimony is very homogenous in result of its construction within a few years following the earlier destruction in 1772. This implies that compared to older settlements along the trade routes of the wider region, it has less capacity to illustrate architectural references to cultural exchanges than cities which look back at millennia of trade exchanges along these very trade routes. ICOMOS considers that it has not been demonstrated how the interchange of cultural influences can be seen as outstanding when compared to other cities along important trade routes in the wider region. // ICOMOS considers that it is not demonstrated that the Sheki khanate produced architectural features or urban layouts which differ distinctively from other cities in the region and therefore could act as an outstanding testimony of khanates as such. ICOMOS further considers that Sheki’s function as a Caucasus khanate capital was rather short-lived and ended after merely 18 years.
- Сохранность
The landscape setting affected by a few hotel complexes which have been developed and remains subject to further urban development pressures given that Sheki is surrounded by mountains in three directions and has limited opportunity to expand. Several hotels were also built within the historical and architectural reserve without respecting the surrounding architectural volumes and styles. In addition, these structures were inserted in key urban historic neighbourhoods and, at times, interrupt the functional and visual relations between the historic monuments. In the same manner, several new residential structures do not correspond to the surrounding architectural proportions, materials or designs.
ICOMOS notes that the percentage of historic structures within the property has been significantly reduced over time. A small percentage of architectural structures is in a very vulnerable condition, the majority of which is in a state of being abandoned or out of appropriate use. These structures are faced with challenges of decay, which might further reduce the integrity of the property in the future.
ICOMOS observed that past and ongoing structural and surface repairs and restorations do not pay respect to authenticity of material, substance or workmanship and, in several cases, design. These repairs are carried out with inappropriate materials including concrete and cement mixtures instead of traditional brick and adobe materials as well as plaster surfaces. These measures unfortunately change the visual appearance of the town’s streetscape, in particular the repairs of the outer townhouse walls, which are so visually determining the appearance of Sheki to a visitor. In addition, these repairs are likely to reduce the traditional earthquake resilience of the original construction methods. ICOMOS therefore considers that the Historic Centre of Sheki with the Khan’s Palace does not demonstrate the qualifying condition of authenticity as required by the Operational Guidelines.